Reckless endangerment covers conduct said to put someone at risk of serious harm, and it is often stacked on top of an assault charge. But "risky" is not enough. We challenge whether what you did actually meets the legal standard.
Reckless endangerment is frequently charged alongside assault, not instead of it. Prosecutors stack it so that even if the assault charge fails, something is left to fall back on. That means beating the case means taking on both charges, and the risk standard on this one is higher than people think.
Maryland reckless endangerment is about conduct that created a real, substantial risk, not just behavior someone calls careless after the fact.
The State has to show your conduct created a substantial risk of death or serious physical injury to another person, judged by what a reasonable person would recognize. A vague claim of "dangerous" does not clear that bar.
Often the alleged conduct was not actually likely to cause serious harm, no real risk existed, or the danger is exaggerated in the report. Those gaps are exactly what we press on.
It can attach to a wide range of situations, often paired with another charge. Common examples include:
To convict, the State has to establish each piece. If even one is missing, the charge can fall.
Your conduct created a substantial risk. Not a slight or theoretical one, a real risk of death or serious physical injury to another person.
A reasonable person would have seen it. The risk has to be one that a reasonable person in your position would have recognized and disregarded.
An actual person was endangered. The conduct has to have put a real person at risk, not just been generally unsafe in the abstract.
This charge lives or dies on the risk standard. We attack it directly.
Was there really a substantial risk of serious harm? Often the conduct does not meet that bar, and we show it.
When it is stacked on an assault, we take on both, so a fallback charge does not become a back-door conviction.
Reports often overstate the danger. We compare witnesses, video, and the facts against the claim.
Dismissal, reduction, or a path that keeps a conviction off your record where the facts allow.
The risk standard is higher than the charge suggests, and reports often overstate the danger. Tell us what happened and get an honest read on your defense. The first conversation is free.